stand in the glow of ripeness

Love

Czesław Miłosz

Love means to learn to look at yourself
The way one looks at distant things
For you are only one thing among many.
And whoever sees that way heals his heart.
Without knowing it, from various ills –
A bird and a tree say to him: Friend.

Then he wants to use himself and things
So that they stand in the glow of ripeness.
It doesn’t matter whether he knows what he serves:
Who serves best doesn’t always understand.

Thanks to Hallie for singling out this poem. I owe thanks to a common friend for my small enjoyment of poetry. It is good to read more by Miłosz.

Advertisements

7 Comments to “stand in the glow of ripeness”

  1. The last two lines put me in mind of this (slightly edited): “My Dad enumerated his atheist friend’s qualities to me and considered his friend a more powerful example of Christian ideals than himself. Because of this my father said that there was no possible way he could state that his friend would, when he died, spend eternity rueing his lack of a personal, individual faith.”

    Seems to me it might behoove he who *would* say such a person has eternal damnation coming, to add an additional couple of lines, beginning with “But it doesn’t matter who serves best:”

    Since I have no race in this dogma, the best I can do is speculate about what might follow that line. Though a satisfying “why” for that “what” beggars my imagination, I’m afraid.

  2. Thanks for sharing your impressions. I agree that the last two lines apply to God as much as (or more than) they do to all of His creations that we are to love. Part of your comment brings to mind the character of Emeth from the last book in C.S. Lewis’ Chronicles of Narnia series. There’s a little discussion of the controversy on wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emeth

    Although I would not see this as at all the main point for Miłosz in this poem, he would probably agree more fully with Lewis than I would on this question (which is ultimately one for God and not for us).

  3. Yeah, I wouldn’t say that’s Milosz’s main point either. You know me, teetering on a tautly tangential tightrope, awning o’er an asymptotic abyss.

  4. You’re rivaling Hopkins with all that alliteration!

  5. I know naught of which you, or apparently I, speak.

    I mean, I don’t know it. 😉

  6. Poet and oughta know it! And now I should to bed. You’re a corrupting influence. 🙂

  7. BTW, it still bugs me, months later, that I botched the race/fight thing and so neglected to use the much superior “no fight in this dogma” formulation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: